JUDGMENT 1. - The matter comes up on the application of the appellant for deleting the name of respondent No. 8 who has expired. However, with consent of the earned counsel for the parties appearing, I have heard the main appeal itself on merits. 2. A bare perusal of the entire memo of appeal shows that the grounds taken to assail the impugned award are, inter alia based on the ground that income of the deceased, extent of dependency of the claimants, appropriateness of the multiplier employed to calculate the compensation, life expectancy of deceased, and other income which the deceased was earning and which survived to the claimants. Of course, in Para 9 a general ground has been taken that the principles of limited liability of the appellant, as per policy conditions should have been followed by the learned Tribunal, but without elucidating as to how the insurer is not liable? 3. Suffice it to observe that all these grounds taken by the appellant in appeal are not open to the appellant as insurer in appeal against the award passed by Motor Accident Claim Tribunal. Consequently, the appeal has no force and is hereby dismissed.Appeal dismissed. *******