ORDER Leave granted. 2. It is unnecessary to go in great detail in this matter. The High Court based its order on a notice which, as it has itself found, was neither signed nor dated nor bore the requisite seal. The rules required that notice must be issued as provided in the Code of Civil Procedure. Clearly, that was not done. No notice of such a kind can at all be considered valid. On the ground, therefore, that the learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition, we are of the view that he was in error. 3. It appears that there were other conclusions reached by the Maharashtra RevenueTribunal that were also under challenge in the writ petition filed by the appellant. To that extent, the writ petition (Writ Petition No. AS-2239 of 1983) shall stand restored to the file of the High Court at Bombay to be heard and disposed of on merits. 4. Order on the appeal accordingly. 5. No order as to costs. Appeal allowed accordingly. *************** Parallel Citations of other Journals : Ankush Keshav Bowlekar v. State of Maharashtra, 2000(7) Supreme 721 00021