(1) THIS writ petition is disposed of in the manner indicated in the signed order. It is clarified that if any of the claimants has any grievance against an order passed by the Welfare Commissioner or by the tribunal, it is open to the claimant to seek judicial review but first it must be sought before the High Court rather than filing a writ petition under Article 32 or a special leave petition under Article 136 directly in this court. (2) THE grievance is also made in this writ petition with regard to lack of proper medical research and the non-functioning of the hospitals and generally with regard to the medical facilities. The issues raised in this regard are covered by Writ Petition (Civil) No. 50 of \ 998 (Bhopal) Gas Peedith Mahila U. Sangat. & Ors. vs. U.O.I. & Ors.) In our opinion, it will be more appropriate to deal with these aspects of the case, namely, pertaining to the furnishing of the medical facilities in Writ Petition (C) No. 50 of 1998. In that petition, pleadings are complete, affidavits have been filed and some orders passed. The petitioner will be at liberty to assist the learned counsel appearing in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 50 of 1998. If necessary, even though we are disposing of this writ petition, the counsel appearing in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 50 of 1998 will be at liberty to refer to any affidavit or document which may have been filed in this Writ Petition. Contempt Petition (C) No. 364/1998 in W.P. (C) No. 66/1995 (3) THE petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh petition giving all necessary particulars. This contempt petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. SLP(C) No. 1107/199S. SLP(C) No. 1187/ 1999, SLP(C) No. 12529/1998, SLP(C) No. 12875/1997, SLP(C) No. 15822/1996, SLP(C) No. 17519/1998, SLP(C) No. 18126/1998, SLP(C) No. 18130/1995, SLP(C) No. ..... CC 1979-1980/1999, Special Leave Petition (C) No. 20742/1998, SLP(C) No. 2191/1999, C.A. No. 2542/1999, SLP(C) No. 26872/1995, SLP(C) No. 26967/ 1995, C.A. No. 3004/1999, C.A. No. 3025/ 1999, C.A. No. 3332/1996, CONT.PET.(C) 364/1998 in WP66/95, SLP(C)...... CC 3723- 3724/1999, SLP(C)..... CC 4678/1996, SLP(C) No. 5005/1999, SLP(C) No. 5065/ 1996, SLP(C) No. 597/1998, SLP(C) No. 6140/1999, SLP(C) No. 8942/1996, SLP(C) No. 9724/1999, SLP(C) No. 9729/1999, and SLP(C) No. 9753/1999 (4) DELAY condoned in SLP(C)........CC1979-1980/1999, SLP(C).....CC3723-3724/99 and SLP(C).......CC4678/1996. CC 3723- 3724/1999, SLP(C)..... CC 4678/1996, SLP(C) No. 5005/1999, SLP(C) No. 5065/ 1996, SLP(C) No. 597/1998, SLP(C) No. 6140/1999, SLP(C) No. 8942/1996, SLP(C) No. 9724/1999, SLP(C) No. 9729/1999, and SLP(C) No. 9753/1999 (4) DELAY condoned in SLP(C)........CC1979-1980/1999, SLP(C).....CC3723-3724/99 and SLP(C).......CC4678/1996. (5) IN our opinion, all these matters should be heard by the High court of Madhya Pradesh who will deal with the individual cases on the basis of the pleadings before it or such pleadings which may be filed. We direct all these matters to be transferred to the High court who will treat them as petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution and deal with them in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. Where the matter arises against an order of the Welfare Commissioner, the same should be heard by a division bench, The Honble chief justice of the High Court will pass appropriate orders in this behalf. Writ Petition (Civil) No. 50 of 1998 (6) RECORD of Proceeding issued on 2 7/01/2000. LA. Nos. 32-37 in C.A. Nos. 3187-88/1988 (7) I.A. Nos. 32-35: It is represented that these lAs have become infructuous. The lAs are, accordingly, dismissed as having become infructuous. (8) 1.A. Nos. 36-37: To come up along with W.P.(C)No.50 of 1998.