CHITRE, J. ( 1 ) HEARD Mr, V. K. Jain for the petitioners. ( 2 ) NOTICE has been sent to insurance company. This is a revision petition and the point involved is disbursement of the compensation amount which has been awarded to the claimants of deceased victim. Mangibai happens to be the widow of deceased Keshuram. Claimant Hemaji is father of deceased Keshuram and claimant Bardibai is his mother. The M. A. C. T. , manasa, had directed that the amount of rs. 30,570 be given to Mangibai but out of that Rs. 10,570 should be given to her in cash and remaining amount of Rs. 20,000 be deposited in fixed deposit of six years' term. M. A. C. T. directed that the amount of compensation awarded to the minors be deposited in fixed deposit in their names for protecting their interest. An application was moved by Mangibai for getting the said amount released to her for maintaining the minor children. The M. A. C. T. , manasa, dismissed that application and, therefore, the petitioners have approached this court, more particularly Mangibai, hemaji and Bardibai. ( 3 ) MR. V. K. Jain, counsel appearing for them submitted that Mangibai has to bring up the minor children, four in number in these hard days of escalating prices, she is not able to do it by utilising the sum of Rs. 10,570. He submitted that keeping in view the ages of parents of deceased keshuram, they be given the amount for the purpose of utilising it for their old age, he pointed out that Rs. 10,000 may be given to both of them in cash. The directions given by the Supreme Court in General Manager, Kerala State Road Trans. Corpn. v. Susamma Thomas, 1994 ACJ 1 (SC), are to be applied to the cases coming before the M. A. C. T. keeping in view the facts of each case. There cannot be a hard and fast rule applicable to all the cases. Some claimants may be needy and some may not be needy. Some claimants may be having their urgent needs and if the amount which has been awarded to them as compensation is not released for using it at the time of difficult situation, there would be nothing else but hardship to such hapless claimants. Some claimants may be needy and some may not be needy. Some claimants may be having their urgent needs and if the amount which has been awarded to them as compensation is not released for using it at the time of difficult situation, there would be nothing else but hardship to such hapless claimants. The M. A. C. T. has to act with a broader approach and has to inform itself about the realities of life and difficulties of the poor villagers and poor persons. One stitch in time saves nine has to be kept in mind. One in the hand is always better than two in bush, is to be understood properly. If such amount is not released for meeting urgent needs of such hapless claimants they would be thrown to village or city shylocks. After getting into the net of these shylocks, every day and night would be a nightmare constantly to them and that would be nothing but dooming them forever by adopting an unreasonable attitude. ( 4 ) THIS court has made it clear in previous judgments also that the justice is to be administered in proper spirit and for the purpose of giving solace to the litigants. A computerised mechanical, emotionless order would not carry the flag ahead which the benevolent spirit of the enactment has indicated. The optimum utilisation has to be always obtained by informing one-self with bitter realities of the life. Such hapless claimants should not be permitted to see the dreams of increasing interest in the bank accounts with fire of hunger in the stomach. Widows, females, minors would not be left on streets in scorching bitterness of the present life searching for sanctuary for the purpose of maintaining their spirit, virtues and souls intact. If these things are lost then what remains for giving them a beaming sunshine of the future? unfortunately, the learned Member of the tribunal has lost sight of all these reasonable realities of the life and, therefore, has landed in error. This court is left with no alternative but to modify the impugned order for the purpose of achieving the benevolent directions which have been indicated by the judgment of the Supreme court in Susamma Thomas' case, 1994 acj 1 (SC), in real spirit keeping in view the facts of the present case. ( 5 ) THUS, the order stands set aside and modified. ( 5 ) THUS, the order stands set aside and modified. The Tribunal is hereby directed to release the amount which has been awarded as compensation to Mangibai, hemaji and Bardibai. But that has to be given to them by crossed cheques for the purpose of avoiding the possibilities of its leakage, as far as possible. ( 6 ) THUS, petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs. Petition allowed. .