JUDGMENT 1. - This appeal arises out of a decision of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ratangarh dated 11.9.1989 passed in criminal case No. 106/84.The trial court recorded that the oil in question was taken in containers and containers were not cleaned. The sanction granted was improper and there was violation of Section 13(2) PFA. Act. Hence, the trial court acquitted the accused. 2. Learned counsel for the State urged that containers were cleaned. This argument of the learned counsel for the State runs contrary to the statement of Food Inspector, Kunj Bihari. The Food Inspector in his statement has not stated that containers in which he sealed the material was cleaned and upright. 3. Regarding sanction, learned counsel for the State urged that there is proper application of mind. A look at Ex.P/9 shows that there was hardly any application of mind on behalf of signing authority because it is printed form and the form has been filed in some other hand writing than the signatory. The learned P.P. has not been able to satisfy the court that provision of Section 13(2) of the Act, was also complied with. In this view of the matter, no interference is called for. The order of the trial court cannot be said to be to perverse or against the record. The appeal having no force is dismissed.Appeal dismissed. *******