JUDGMENT 1. - This appeal is directed against the order of acquittal dated 15.3.1983 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate. Udaipur in Cr Case No. 195/1980. 2. With the assistance of the learned counsel for the accused, I have scrutinised the record and re-appreciated the evidence on record. 3. On appreciation of the entire evidence on record, the learned trial Judge came to the conclusion for reasons stated in the impugned order that the accused cannot be held guilty of offence with which they are charged. Consistent with the finding of not guilt, the learned trial Judge proceeded to acquit the accused. This acquittal is impugned in this appeal on the grounds mentioned in the memo of appeal. 4. The position of law in relation to interference in the matter of acquittals ordered by court of competent jurisdiction is well settled. I have already taken this view in a detailed judgment in criminal appeal No. 288/92 delivered on 12.2.98. It is well settled now, therefore, that unless the findings given by the learned trial Judge for recording acquittal are perverse or palpably wrong and cannot at all be supported by the evidence as it stands on record, interference by the appellate court, merely on the possibility of another conclusion on re-appreciation of evidence is possible, should not be undertaken. 5. It is after keeping in mind this position of law regarding interference in the matter of acquittal that I will have to examine the order of acquittal in the present case. With the able assistance of the learned counsel for the accused, I have carefully gone through the record and proceedings of this case and I re-appreciated the evidence on record. I have scrutinised the judgment of the trial court regarding reasons for acquittal and I find myself in agreement with the reasons recorded by the learned Judge on appreciation of the evidence on record. Since I am in agreement with the finding of acquittal recorded by the learned Judge as also reasons given by him, I see no reason to separately repeat my appreciation of evidence and repeat the reasons for upholding the acquittal. Suffice it to say that the order of the learned Judge acquitting the accused is well reasoned order on appreciation of evidence. Hence, the appeal fails and is dismissed.Appeal dismissed. *******