Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2000 DIGILAW 354 (RAJ)

Goma Ram v. State of Rajasthan

2000-03-14

BHAGWATI PRASAD

body2000
JUDGMENT 1. - Learned counsel for the petitioners, in this petition, has raised a grievance that the learned trial court could not have added the offence under Section 326 Indian Penal Code. This offence has been added by examining witness without framing charge unauthorisedly. 2. I have heard the learned Counsel for the parties and have considered the submissions. 3. At this stage, the adding of charge for consideration of the court does not amount to a situation where this Court should exercise its revisional jurisdiction more particularly when the question of interpretation of nature of the injury is involved. It would be open to the learned Counsel for the petitioners to urge this point at an appropriate stage. No inteference is called for. 4. With these observations, the revision petition is disposed of.Revision dismissed. *******