Judgment K. S. Kumaran, J. 1. F. I. R. No.163 dated 18-10-1998 has been registered at Police Station Sadar Malout under Sections 304-B! 498-A,506, 148 and 149, IPC. on the statement of Sukhjit Kaur wherein it has been alleged that Simarjit Kaur the sister of the complainant who was married to Jaswinder Singh the son of the petitioner-herein, was being harassed by her husband mother-inlaw and others demanding more dowry. 2. Petitioner-daljit Kaur who is mother-in-law of deceased had approached the Additional Sessions Judge. Muktsar for bail but her application for bail was dismissed and. therefore she has approached this Court under Sec.439. Cr. P. C. 3. I have heard the Counsel for both the sides and perused the records. The allegation in the F. I. R. is that even from the time of the marriage Simatjit Kaur was being taunted for bringing less dowry. It is also alleged that a child was born to Simatjit Kaur and at that time, she was taunted on the ground that she had not brought the sufficient gifts. As per F. I. R. in- laws also allegedly demanded a Harvesting Combine at the time when the marriage of another sister of the deceased was performed. It is further been alleged that on 13-1-1998. Simatjit Kaur (deceased) was beaten by her husband and was brought to her parental home and left by her husband and others, Simatjit Kaur, who remained at her parental home allegedly committed suicide by hanging herself on 11-10-1998. 4. The learned Counsel for the petitioner contends that the complaint on the basis of which the F. I. R, in question has been registered has not been given by the father or brothers. He also contends that the maternal uncle of the deceased by name Surjit Singh is an Ex-Sarpanch of the village and a former Chairman of the Market Committee pointing out these aspects learned Counsel for the petitioner contends that in spite of all these facts the body of Simatjit Kaur was not subjected to post-mortem and was cremated on 11-10-1998 itself without any complaint whatsoever but the sister of the deceased who is a resident of a Madhya Pradesh, has alleged this complaint on 18-10-1998 falsely implicating the petitioner and others. 5. 5. The learned Counsel for the petitioner contends that even as per allegations in the F. I. R. ever since 13-11998 Simatjit Kaur (deceased) has been residing in her parental home and there is no allegation that the petitioner who is her mother-in-law had come to the parental home and harassed her for dowry. According to the petitioner the deceased was pressing her husband to partition his lands and to have a separate mess and when, she did not succeed she had left the home and had died thereafter. He also contends that there is also nothing to show that Simatjit Kaur died due to unnatural causes. The learned Counsel for the petitioner also relies upon the decision of the Honble Supreme Court in Sham Lal V/s. State of Haryana1 in support of his contention that when there is no evidence that the deceased was harassed soon before her death it cannot be presumed that the deceased was harassed and treated with cruelty soon before her death. 6. In these circumstances without meaning to express any opinion on the merits of the main case I am of the view that the petitioner is entitled to be released on bail. Petition allowed Petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on her furnishing sufficient surety, to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial, Magistrate, Faridkot. Petition allowed.