JUDGMENT 1. :- The petitioner has sought direction to place him at appropriate place in the final seniority list. Grievance of the petitioner is that he was wrongly deprived of promotion on the post of Assistant Engineer and placing him in the seniority list below the juniors was an unconstitutional action. 2. Though the petitioner has not worded the writ petition properly but it has been established from the record that the petitioner was charge sheeted under rule 6 of the Rajasthan State Electricity Board (Classification, Control and Appeal) Regulations 1962 and after proper enquiry the petitioner was punished vide order dated August 19, 1975 whereby penalty of stoppage of one grade increment without cumulative effect was imposed upon him. 3. I am not impressed by the arguments of the learned counsel Mr. Raj Deepak Rastogi that the denial of promotion to the petitioner amounts to second punishment. In Union of India and others vs. K. Krishnan (1992 Supp. (3) SCC 50) it was indicated by their Lordships of the Supreme Court that to punish a servant and at the same time to promote him during the currency of the punishment may justifiably be termed as self contradictory. Moreover, the petitioner is not entitled to any relief as he has concealed the material fact that he was served with a charge sheet and penalty was imposed upon him. 4. I find no merit in the writ petition, it is accordingly dismissed without any order as to costs.Petition Dismissed. *******