B. A. Khan ( 1 ) APPELLANT has contracted a second marriage sometime in 1993 and had also a son from this marriage in 1995. And yet he is contesting a decree of divorce obtained by respondent. ( 2 ) HIS appeal, therefore, represents a harassment proceeding. Even otherwise it is meritless because it is based on a reasoned judgment and there is hardly any scope for interference in the findings returned on appreciation of evidence. This appeal is, accordingly dismissed on preliminary hearing. Appeal dismissed on preliminary hearing.