R. R. TRIPATHI, J. ( 1 ) THE present petition is filed challenging the judgement and award dated 22. 1. 1991, passed by the Labour Court, Rajkot in Reference (LCR) No. 1408 of 1984. The operative part of the said award reads as under :"the applicant, Jitendra B. Mehta is serving elsewhere and therefore, he has waived his relief for reinstatement, but he is held to be entitled for 50% of the back wages for the period commencing from 10th June 1982 to 29th May 1984. COST of this Reference, Rs. 150. 00 be paid by the opponent to the applicant. " ( 2 ) LEARNED advocate for the petitioner is not able to satisfy this Court as to how the petitioner can be permitted to press for reliefs as prayed for in par 7 of the petition, more particularly for the relief of reinstatement once he has already waived the said relief as he was serving at some other place. ( 3 ) LEARNED advocate for the respondent corporation, Mr. Paresh Upadhyaya, stated that the corporation has not challenged the award in question. He further stated that he does not have any specific instructions about the compliance of the award. Mr. Upadhyaya further submitted that the award must have been complied with by the corporation. ( 4 ) ON perusal of the papers, petition is not found to have any merits. Learned advocate for the petitioner is not able to assail the award in question on any grounds. ( 5 ) THE petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. .