Judgment :- 1. This revision petition has been filed against the order of arrest of the revision petitioner. 2. The petitioner is the judgment debtor. Admittedly, in the Second Appeal filed by him, this Court passed a conditional order directing him to deposit a portion of the decree amount, which he has not complied with. Only because of his non-compliance of the conditional order, the execution had been levied. In the execution proceedings, arrest was ordered. 3. Having borrowed the amount from the respondent herein and having suffered a decree, now it is pleaded by the petitioner herein that in case he succeeds in the Second Appeal, he will not be in a position to recover the amount from the respondent herein, since he has no means. This is rather ridiculous on the part of the petitioner herein to raise such a plea, after having suffered a decree. 4. Moreover, as the decree has been put to execution and as the petitioner did not pay the decree amount, I do not find any error of jurisdiction in the order of arrest of the petitioner herein for recovery of the decree amount. 5. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner requests two weeks time to deposit the entire decree amount before the executing Court. 6. Considering the request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court grants two weeks time from today to the petitioner to deposit the entire decree amount before the executing Court to the credit of the suit O.S. No. 705 of 1995, failing which, the order of arrest will be executed without any prior notice to the petitioner herein. 7. The revision petition is disposed of with the above directions. Consequently, the above C.M.P. is dismissed.