ORDER: The petitioner seeks to quash the charge-sheet filed in S.T.C.No.726 of 2000 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sivagiri, Tirunelveli District, wherein, the petitioner is facing a trail for the offences punishable under Secs. 341, 323 and 355, I.P.C., at the instance of a complaint lodged by one Gopalsami, P.W.1, on the only ground that the respondent investigating agency had not conducted an identification parade and even as per the plan marked along with the charge sheet, the charge of wrongful confinement is not made out. 2. In my considered opinion, it is well-settled in law that the Court would not be entitled to sift the materials for coming to the conclusion, taking the reality of the evidence. At the stage of framing the charges, the Court can take the evidence on its face value and find out that an offences is made out, taking the entire materials on record, and therefore, once the ingredients of the offences alleged and satisfied, it may be permissible for this Court to interfere with the charges framed, as it is well-settled in law that whether or not the petitioners could be found guilty of the offences and convicted as such, is a matter to be decided in the trial; and at the stage of framing the charges, all that was required to be seen by the Court was whether the ingredients of the offences could be said to have been made out from the averments in the complaint and the preliminary evidence led in support thereof. 3. Therefore, since the respondent is satisfied with the preliminary evidence and framed the charges, it is not permissible for this Court to quash the same, exercising the power conferred under Sec.482, Crl.P.C. Hence, this Crl.O.P. is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, Crl.M.P. Nos.5883 and 5884 of 2000 are also dismissed.