ORDER This is a transfer petition by the wife. She seeks the transfer of matrimonial proceedings filed by the husband before the District Judge, Barmer, Rajasthan to a court in Chandigarh. It is the wifes case that she cannot travel alone from Chandigarh, where she now stays, to Barmer which is about 700 kilometres away. She cannot leave her four-year-old daughter, h who is otherwise also unwell, during the time she would have to go to But that special leave petition was dismissed in May 1995. Thereafter the appellant moved the Managing Director for exonerating him from the financial liability. Though he succeeded to a certain extent in that endeavour he was not able to tide over the liability in its entirety. All these things happened during the interval between the date of passing the award and the date of his filing the appeal. 5. Whether those events were sufficient for condoning the delay or not was considered by the Appellate Authority in exercise of its discretion and it showed inclination to accept them for condoning the delay. As the Appellate Authority had done so in its discretion it is well within the jurisdiction vested under law. In such a situation it was not proper that the High Court in exercise of its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 or 227 of the Constitution upset such a finding granted to the appellant which only enabled him to have the statutory remedy of appeal pursued further. 6. In the result we allow this appeal and set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court. Now the appeal filed by the appellant under Section 93 of the Act will be disposed of on merits by the authority concerned.