R. C. CHOPRA ( 1 ) ( 2 ) THIS petition challenges orders dated 5. 9. 2000 passed by learned trial Judge dismissing petitioner s application for postponement of the proceedings against her under Section 329 of the Code of Criminal procedure on the ground that the ac- cused/petitioner is of unsound mind. The main ground of the petitioner is that learned trial Judge has declined her prayer without holding any inquiry, as envisaged under Sec- tion 329 Criminal Procedure Code. Learned counsel for the respondent-MCD submits that the respon- dent has no objection if the matter is remanded back to the Court with directions to hold appropriate inquiry and then take a decision afresh on the application moved by the petitioner. ( 3 ) UNDER these circumstances, the revision petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 5. 9. 2000 is set aside and the case is remanded back to the trial Court with directions to hold further inquiry into the matter and decide the issue afresh after ex- amining the doctor, who had given a report that the petitioner was not of sound mind enough to face the proceedings before the court. ( 4 ) FURTHER proceedings in the matter before the Court under Sections 332/461 of delhi Municipal Corporation Act shall be initiated only after taking a decision on the petitioner s application under Section 329. The petition is disposed of accordingly. Dasti.