Research › Browse › Judgment

Supreme Court of India · body

2001 DIGILAW 1781 (SC)

DILIP K. BASU v. STATE OF W. B.

2001-10-19

A.S.ANAND, ARIJIT PASAYAT, N.S.HEGDE

body2001
ORDER Crl. MP No. 12704 of 2001 According to the affidavits filed by most of the States and Union Territories, the 11 requirements laid down by this Court on 18-12-1996 in the interest of the arrestees and to minimize, if not altogether eliminate, custodial violence, are being implemented. There are, however, some reports which have appeared in the press or otherwise brought to our notice that despite “those requirements”, the rights of the arrestees, which are sought to be protected by those requirements are not being respected and custodial violence continues. With a view to ensure proper compliance, we consider it now proper that for further monitoring of the case as spelt out in Dilip K. Basu case besides other statutory safeguards, are implemented in letter and in spirit, that the task be assigned to the Human Rights Commission constituted in various States/Union Territories. We, accordingly, request the Chairmen of the State Human Rights Commission of different States/Union Territories to constitute a sub-committee in the Human Rights Commission with a view to oversee whether those requirements are being carried out or not and to take all such further necessary steps as are required to ensure that those requirements are carried out. It shall be open to the Committee constituted by the Chairman of the State Human Rights Commission, to make surprise checks with a view to see actual implementation of those requirements. In the States or Union Territories, where Human Rights Commissions have not been set up, we request the Chief Justice of the High Court concerned, to constitute a committee, as found appropriate for the same purpose and directions which we have given in regard to the State Human Rights Commission would equally apply to those Committees also. A report of action taken shall be sent to this Court by the Committee of the State Human Rights Commission or the Committee constituted by the Hon’ble Chief Justice of the High Courts within three months. List the matter for further directions after three months in consultation with the learned amicus.