JUDGMENT P. K. MISRA, J. — The petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Commissioner, Consolidation and Settlement, Orissa, Bhubaneswar, rejecting the revision of the petitioner under Sec. 15(b) of the Orissa Survey and Settlement Act, 1958. The peti¬tioner claims that he has title over the disputed property, but the same has been wrongly recorded in Rakshit Khata of the State Government as Gochar land. 2. Law is well settled that Records-of-Rights neither create, nor extinguish title. The revisional authority has re¬fused to entertain the matter as the revision had been file 15 days after the final publication of the Record-of-Rights. Since the question of title is involved and disputed questions of fact are likely to arise, it is more appropriate to direct the peti¬tioner to file a suit for establishing his title. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner apprehends that taking advantage of the wrong recording, the petitioner may be forcibly evicted from the disputed land. Law is well settled that no person can be forcibly evicted from a land without taking recourse to the appropriate procedure contemplated under the law. If any proceeding under the Orissa Prevention of Land Encroachment Act is initiated, it would be open to the petitioner to establish his right before such forum and even if any adverse decision is taken, the petitioner can always establish his title before the Civil Court, as has been observed by this Court in the decision reported in 90 (2000) CLT 412 (Brundaban Sahoo v. An¬taryami Sahoo and others). 4. The writ application is disposed of subject to afore¬said observation. Application disposed of subject to observation.