JUDGMENT 1. - Heard the learned counsel for the accused applicant, Shri B.S. Chauhan, as well as the learned Public Prosecutor. 2. Perused the material available on record. 3. It is urged by the learned counsel for the accused applicant that FIR No. 75/2000 was lodged against the accused applicant alongwith 11 other co-accused, at police station Mandrail District Karauli and the accused applicants side also lodged an FIR No. 76/2000 against the complainant side on the same police station. Cross cases are registered against both side. It is urged by the learned counsel for the accused applicant that accused applicants side received 54 injuries and some of these are grievous, whereas, 'the complainant side received 29 injuries. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the accused applicant that 10 co-accused have already been granted bail and on the ground of parity the present accused applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 4. Looking into the totality of the facts and circumstances of the present case, I am satisfied that the accused applicant should be enlarged on bail. 5. It is ordered that the accused applicant Babu son of Parmal, be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond to the sum of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before the said court during the pendency of trial against him in this case.Bail granted. *******