JUDGMENT 1. - Heard the learned counsel for the applicant, Shri S.K. Gupta, as well as the learned Public Prosecutor, Shri S.S. Rathore. 2. Perused the material available on record. 3. It is borne out from the perusal of the FIR as well as from the statement of the prosecutrix recorded by Magistrate under Section 164 Cr.P.C., that the accused applicant is neither named in the FIR nor in the statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. 4. The learned public prosecutor fails to demonstrate any reason as to on what ground the accused applicant is detained by the Investigating Officer. 5. Looking into the totality of the facts and circumstances of the present case, I am satisfied that the applicant should be enlarged on bail. 6. It is ordered that the accused applicant Kishan Lal son of Shri Bhainru, be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before the said court during the pendency of trial against him in this case.Bail granted. *******