MUKUL MUDGAL ( 1 ). Rule. ( 2 ). With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up today for final hearing. ( 3 ). The petitioner had been granted a Licence No. 4008/95 for Kerosene Oil Depot in Circle 19 in the year 1995. The normal parameters for a licence is that one licence should have 800 food cards for one kerosene oil depot. The petitioner sought a transfer of licence from Circle 19 which was allotted to it where it had only 96 food cards to any other circle and eventually sought a transfer to Circle no. 22. The request of the petitioner was based on the memorandum dated 17/11/1988 which inter alia provides for a transfer in cases of extreme genuineness and hardship which include inadequate number of food cards. It is not in dispute that existing food cards, i. e. , are wholly inadequate as compared to the optimum requirement of 800 food cards and this would cause extreme hardship to the petitioner, as required by the said Memorandum. The relevant portion of the said Memorandum reads as under: "there may be, however, cases of extreme genuiness and hardship. There may be eviction in pursuance of the Court Order of the PDS outlet from the existing business premises. There may also arise serious dispute between PDS owner who may be a tenant and the landlord and the cases might be pending in the Court of law, and there might be a case of inadequate number of food cards and there might not be any scope for increase of the number of foodcards in the near future. Such cases can be considered on merits by the Zonal Officers and if considered necessary in the interest of the PDS and the consumers, change in the business premises may be effected with the prior approval of the Commissioner, fands, and Executive Councillor (Health ). . 1s1" ( 4 ). The petitioner eventually applied for transfer to circle 22 on 31/1/2000. The said request was declined by the respondents on 13/6/2000 and the vacancy in the Circle no. 22 was advertised on 1/7/2000. The impugned Order dated 13/6/2000 dismisses the petitioner s application for shifting its Kerosene Oil Depot from Shalimar Bagh to OKN, wyz Blocks of Prem Nagar-II, Circle 22 on the ground that there are no vacancies of Circle 22. 22 was advertised on 1/7/2000. The impugned Order dated 13/6/2000 dismisses the petitioner s application for shifting its Kerosene Oil Depot from Shalimar Bagh to OKN, wyz Blocks of Prem Nagar-II, Circle 22 on the ground that there are no vacancies of Circle 22. However, on 1/7/2000 vacancies of Circle 22 are advertised. Thus it is evident that the Order dated 13/6/2000 is not sustainable as the reasoning in that order is vitiated by the advertisement dated 1/7/2000. The petitioner, therefore, fulfils all the requirements of the Office Memorandum dated 17/11/1988 and since there is an established case of extreme genuineness and hardship, it is just and proper that since sufficient number of food cards are available in Circle No. 22, as demonstrated by the advertisement dated 1/7/2000, the petitioner s request for granting Circle No. 22 be accepted. ( 5 ). Accordingly, a writ of mandamus is issued, quashing the order dated 13/6/2000 and directing the respondents to transfer the petitioner s Licence (No. 4008/95) of Kerosene oil Depot from Shalimar Bagh to OKN, WYZ Blocks of Prem nagar-II, Circle 22 by implementing the Policy no. F. 4 (5)/86-CPA (D)/20566 dated 17/11/1988 within four weeks from today. In view of the said directions, the impugned Notification dated 1/7/2000 may be given eeffect to after the petitioner s licence is transferred to circle 22. ( 6 ). With these observations, the petition is accordingly allowed as indicated above with no orders as to costs.