COMMISSIONER OF CUS. , BANGALORE v. CENTRAL MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE
2001-07-05
ASHOK BHAN, CHIDANANDA ULLAL
body2001
DigiLaw.ai
( 1 ) WE agree with the view taken by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (for short CEGAT) that the Notification Annexure-D was clarificatory in nature. It amended the earlier Notifications and substituted the words "spare Parts" with the words "computer software". Clarificatory Notifications are retrospective in nature and the CEGAT has rightly granted the benefit of the Notification Annexure-D to the respondent Assessee. ( 2 ) REFERABLE question of law does not arise from the order of the CEGAT. Dismissed.