JUDGMENT 1. - Both the bail applications arise-out from the same incident, therefor, they are decided by a composite order. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the accused applicants, Shri Manoj Sharma as well as the learned Public Prosecutor, Shri Rajendra Yadav. 3. Perused the case diary of FIR No. 205/2000, in which accusations are made accused applicants and case diary of FIR No. 206/2000, lodged at the same police station by the side of the accused applicants. 4. It is revealed from the perusal of the case diary that one person died from the side of complainant and 4 persons are injured, whereas, from the side of the accused applicants 3 persons are injured. There is no explanation about the injuries of the accused applicants in the FIR No. 205/2000, lodged by the side of complainant. 5. it is revealed from the perusal of the injury report of Poona Ram that he received 3 injuries, one incised wound and other lacerated wound on head. In the aforesaid `Mar-Peet although Phoolararn received one injury on head for which he has been operated twice and his physical condition is still critical. 6. Looking into the totality of the facts and circumstances of the present case, I am persuaded to enlarge the accused applicants on bail. 7. It is, therefore, ordered that the accused applicants Purna Ram son of Gharsi Ram and Pokhar @ Ranjeet son of Phoola Ram, be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/-(Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before the said court during the pendency of trial against them in this case.Bail granted. Application allowed. *******