JUDGMENT 1. - In both these cases a very short controversy is involved. The petitioners claim the khatedari rights over the land but the part of the said land has not been shown in the revenue record as under their khatedari rights. For the same purpose, the petitioners have filed for correction of the revenue record and therein the interim order not to dispossess the petitioners has been passed. In the meanwhile, the land had become command area. However, the petitioners have denied the right of irrigation only on the ground that in the revenue record, they have not been shown the khatedar in respect of the entire land. As for the same controversy, revenue suits are pending and interim orders are in favour of petitioners, there is no reason for the respondents to deny them the right of irrigation facility. 2. Thus, both these writ petitions stand disposed of with the direction that in case the petitioners produce the certified copy of the order from the revenue Court that the revenue suits are still pending and interim orders passed therein are still in existence, the authority shall pass the appropriate order and the petitioners shall deposit the required charges etc. The needful to be done by the respondents within a period of eight weeks from the date of filing the required documents by the petitioners.Petition disposed of. *******