ORDER Delay condoned. Leave granted. 2. This appeal impugns the order of the High Court on a writ petition. The High Court dismissed the writ petition but affirmed the right of the appellant-Management to hold a disciplinary enquiry after fresh notice to the respondent-workman. The Labour Court in its award, which was impugned before the High Court, had ordered reinstatement. The respondent-workman had been working as a Security Guard. The plea before us was that the appellant-Management had lost all confidence in the respondent-workman. Since the element of confidence is necessary insofar as a security guard is concerned, notice was issued on the special leave petition limited to the question of compensation to the respondent-workman in lieu of his reinstatement. 3. From time to time the matter was adjourned to enable the parties to try and work out what that compensation should be. But they have failed to do so. Having regard to the fact that the respondent-workman had been engaged on 7th July 1982, only three years of service were left and he was drawing Rs. 3045/- per month, we are of the view that the compensation in lieu of reinstatement should be fixed at Rs. 2,25,000/- (Rupees two lakhs and twenty five thousand). The amount shall be paid within six weeks. Order on the appeal accordingly. No order as to costs. Appeal disposed of accordingly. ****************** Parallel Citations of other Journals : Shriram RefrIgeration Industries v. Hon ble Addl. Industrial Tribunal-Cum-Labour Court, 2001(6) Supreme 400 : 2001 (2) LLJ 428 : 2001 (3) LLN 852 : 2001 LLR 1117 00023