ORDER V. Gopala Gowda, J.—Petitioner claims that the tank situated in Sy. No. 100/1 belongs to him. He has filed this writ petition seeking to quash the impugned order at Annexure-G dated 17.4.2001. In the said order the Deputy Director of Land Records has held that the tank bed situated in Sy. No. 100 belongs to Government. To arrive that conclusion, he has perused the original Survey Register, the Re-survey Register and the Akarband and found that water from Sy. No. 100 flows to Sy. No. 100/1 through the canal. In the Akarband Register it has been entered as 'B' Kharab, which means it is meant for public purpose as specified in Rule 21(2)(b) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Rules, 1966. Therefore, there is no basis or merit in the claim of the Petitioner that the tank belongs to him. The impugned order is perfectly justified and there is no scope for interference. 2. The contention urged by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner by placing reliance upon the decision of this Court reported in ILR 2001 Kar 2924 (M. Shanthamma Vs. Joint Director of Land Records, Mysore) that the first Respondent has no jurisdiction to pass the impugned order as he has no jurisdiction to entertain revision petition, cannot be accepted. It was the Petitioner who approached the first Respondent and subjected to his jurisdiction. Having approached him, it is not now open to the Petitioner to raise such a contention merely because the impugned order is not in his favour. Petitioner is estopped from taking such a contention. 3. Writ Petition being devoid of merit, stands dismissed.