JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel in this revision petition filed under section 397/401, Cr.RC. and perused the record. 2. The revisioners were convicted and sentenced under sections 447, 427, 323, 323/34, by the courts below by the impugned order dated 21.5.2001. They were given benefit of probation to remain of goods behaviour for a period of 3 years. However, each of the revisioners have been asked to deposit Rs. 5,000/- within period of 15 days, to be paid to injured persons as compensation. Aggrieved against that order, this revision petition has been filed. 3. Learned counsel for the revisioners has taken me through the judgment as also record and pointed out that out of two injured persons, Mst. Munni Devi received only 3 simple blunt injuries on non-vital parts whereas Ram Kishore has received one incised wound, which was sharp and simple in nature, along with two blunt injuries. All these injuries are on non-vital parts. The court-below has not rightly appreciated the matter and has been kind enough to injured persons and awarded them compensation amounting to Rs. 15,000/-. 4. I have given my careful consideration to the rival contention of learned counsel for the parties. Looking to nature of injuries, the awarded compensation, to the tune of Rs. 15,000/-, is not commensurate to the harm caused to bodies of injured persons. Therefore, instead of Rs. 15,000/-, award of compensation is substituted with Rs. 6,000/- only. Each of the revision-petitioners shall deposit Rs. 2000/- within 15 days from today. 5. Upon deposit of the amount, it shall be given to injured Ram Kishore, who received simple sharp injuries along with two blunt injuries. The remaining order under revision is upheld. 6. The revision petition stands disposed of accordingly.Revision Petition disposed of. *******