Research › Browse › Judgment

Supreme Court of India · body

2002 DIGILAW 1047 (SC)

Delhi Bar Association v. Union of India

2002-09-02

ARIJIT PASAYAT, B.N.KIRPAL, K.G.BALAKRISHNAN

body2002
ORDER : UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following 1. We reiterate that what was required by our order dated 12th August, 2002 was only a determination by the Chief Justice of Delhi High Court as to which rooms in the Tis Hazari complex can be retained by the Delhi Government, and for what purpose, in connection with the functioning of the courts there. It need not spend any time on the question as to whether it requires more court rooms or not. That is irrelevant. Affidavit be filed by the Registrar indicating the rooms identified by Hon'ble the Chief Justice which can be retained by the Delhi Administration for the functioning of the Courts. Needful be done within a week. To come up after two weeks. It is clear that except for the rooms identified by the Hon'ble the Chief Justice, every other room in occupation of the Delhi Government will have to be vacated.