Research › Browse › Judgment

Supreme Court of India · body

2002 DIGILAW 1092 (SC)

Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India

2002-09-09

ARIJIT PASAYAT, B.N.KIRPAL, K.G.BALAKRISHNAN

body2002
ORDER : 1. The Grievance Redressal Authority having been put in place, there is no reason for this Court to interfere. As far as the dispute raised in this petition is concerned, that is over and final with the earlier decision of this Court. In case an oustee or a person affected by the Project has any grievance, it is open to him to approach the Grievance Redressal Authority. 2. It is also contended that land for land has not been given. If there is any person so aggrieved or has a justifiable grievance, it is open to that person to approach the Grievance Redressal Authority, failing which this Court. 3. It is made clear that full assistance will be rendered by the Narmada Control Authority as well as the State Governments to the Grievance Redressal Authority in the discharge of their respective functions. This writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.