ORDER 1. In this batch of appeals, the scope of Section 51-A of the Land Acquisition. Act arises for consideration, with particular reference as to whether it is necessary, before placing reliance uponcertified copy ofregistered sale deed(s), to disclose the guideline or yardstick for fixing up the market value of an acquired land, to examine anyone connected with the said sale deed(s) or the transaction covered by it, ascondition precedent. 2. In the decision in Land Acquisition Officer & Mandai Revenue Officer v. V. Narasaiahl rendered byBench of three learned Judges of this Court, as could be seen, on perusal of paras 16 and 17, it has been held that even without examining connected with the transactions mentioned therein,particular certified copy of the sale. deed could be relied upon in evidence on being marked and suchconsequence would inevitably followfrom the very language of Section 51-of the Act. 3. In State of Haryana v. Ram Singh applying the above principle,Bench of two learned Judges of this Court has takensimilar view. But, unfortunately, the decision in Meharban v. State of U.P. rendered byBench of three learned Judges of this Court takingdifferent view has not been specifically referred to or overruled, in the latest decision in Narasaiah . 4. Having regard to all this, we consider it appropriate and necessary to direct the Registry to place these matters before the Honble the Chief Justice of India for the purpose of placing the matters before an appropriate larger Bench for deciding this issue and givequietus to the controversy, finally. Court Master