Research › Browse › Judgment

Supreme Court of India · body

2002 DIGILAW 111 (SC)

R. Sai Bharathi v. J. Jayalalitha

2002-01-22

K.T.THOMAS, S.N.PHUKAN

body2002
ORDER : SLP (Cri) No.............../2002 (Cri. M. P. Nos. 122-128) and SLP (Cri.) No................./2002 (Cri. M. P. Nos. 485-490) The petitioners have filed applications for permission to file Special Leave Petitions. After hearing Mr. F. S. Nariman and Mr. Anil B. Divan, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners, we are inclined to grant the leave sought for by the petitioners to move the Special Leave Petitions. 2. Leave granted. 3. Issue notice. 4. Liberty to mention. SLP (Cri.) No................/2002 (Cri M. P. No. 401) 5. As the leave to appeal has been granted against the impugned judgment it is unnecessary to pass another order to the same effect in this Special Leave Petition. However, this Special Leave Petition will be tagged with Criminal Appeal Nos.................. /2002@ SLP (Cri.) Nos. .............../2002 @ Criminal Misc. Petition Nos. 122-128 and Criminal Appeal Nos................/2002 ) SLP (Cri.) Nos................/2002 @ Criminal Misc. Petition Nos. 485-490 and petitioner-in-person in this Special Leave Petition would be at liberty to address his arguments at the hearing stage. 6. The petitioner-in-person submitted that Cri. M. P. No. 402/2002 (for stay) is not pressed. This is recorded. Order accordingly.