RAKESH KUMAR v. MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE AND DEVELOPMENT
2002-01-28
MADAN B.LOKUR
body2002
DigiLaw.ai
ANIL DEV SINGH ( 1 ) LEARNED counsel for the parties have invited our attention to the Notification dated 4th January, 2002 issued by the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions (Department of Personnel and Training ). In view of the above notification, learned counsel for the appellant states that he will move the Administrative Tribunal for resolution of the grievances and disputes. ( 2 ). Learned counsel for the parties state that the appeal be disposed of in view of the aforesaid notification. ( 3 ). The only question which arises in this appeal for determination is whether or not the ncert is a state within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India. In view of the notification, It is no longer necessary to determine the question since the matter now falls within the purview of the Administrative Tribunal. ( 4 ). Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of. It is clarified that this order and the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge will not come in the way of the appellant in seeking his remedy before the Administrative Tribunal. CM Nos. 427-28/2001 ( 5 ). Since the appeal has been disposed of, no further orders are required to be. passed in these applications and the same are, accordingly, disposed of.