Per T.S. Doabia, Judge (Oral): 1. Quality of Education in professional institutions is not supposed to be compromised This has been repeated time and again. Appellants, who are not qualified went to be sent to the Course on the plea that once upon a lime, one time relaxation was given. 2.Facts are under:- The appellants submitted applications before the respondents for being deputed to Government Ancillary Medical Training School. Jammu, for undergoing Para Medical Assistants Training Course. Admittedly, the appellants do not possess the requisite qualification of 10+2 with science. Their case is that on 20-11-2000 a Government order was passed. By this order, one time exception was granted. Candidates, who had not passed 10+2 examination with science were to be given admission. 3. As indicated above, this was one time exception. Notwithstanding the issuance of this Government order, the appellants were not deputed. This was for the session 2000-01. A learned Single Judge of this Court came to the conclusion that as candidates stood already selected for the session 2000-01, and as the duration of the course is one year, and as that duration of the course is over, no effective relief can be granted to the appellants. It is this view expressed by a learned Single Judge of this Court, which is subject matter of challenge in this appeal. 4. As indicated above, the appellants do not possess the requisite qualifications. They are seeking benefit of the order, which gave one time exception. 5. The question arises as to whether the appellants, who were not granted admission, can now be granted admission or not. The session for which they were seeking admission is since over. By no process the clock can be set back and appellants cannot seek admission to that course. 6. So far as the current academic session is concerned, a candidate must possess 10+2 qualification with science as an essential subject. If the appellants lack this qualification, then it would not be apt for this Court to give a direction that the appellants notwithstanding the fact that they lack essential qualification should be deputed for training during the current session. The learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that even now, some candidates have been deputed for the training course, which began in the year 2000. 7. We are. The learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that even now, some candidates have been deputed for the training course, which began in the year 2000. 7. We are. of the opinion, that if qualifications for deputing a particular candidate for undergoing a particular training course is 10+2 with science, then this has strictly to be observed. There can be no compromise on this issue. In arriving at this view, we are guided by the decision of the Supreme Court given in case reported as Arti Gupta Vs. State of Punjab, AIR 1988 SC 481 and also the view expressed in another case reported as State of U.P. Vs. Anupam Gupta, AIR 1992 SC 932. In the aforementioned two decisions, it has been observed that in Professional Colleges, the trend to grant admission in mid stream should not be encouraged and the quality of education should not be compromised with by giving relaxations. 8. In view of the above, we do not find any merit in this appeal. We also observe that the State would see to it that during the current session, no person, who docs not possess the requisite essential qualifications is deputed for training. 9. The other argument raised is that some persons, who were junior to the appellants have been deputed and therefore, the appellant should also be deputed. As indicated above the appellants do not possess the requisite qualifications, and this Court cannot come to their rescue. The mere (act that some candidates, who did not possess the requisite qualifications and should not have been sent is a matter which cannot be undone now. as they have completed the course of study. This appeal, as such, is found to be without any merit and is accordingly dismissed.