ORDER : G.B. Pattanlk, K.G. Balakrishnan, JJ. I.A. No.6 in Original Suit No.2. This is an application filed by the plaintiff-State of Assam, for amendment of the plaint in view of the subsequent events. State of Nagaland has serious objections to the same. But, we see no justification in the objections in question. Prayer for amendment is accordingly allowed. State of Nagaland is permitted to file its written objections. 2. The amended plaint may be filed within four weeks from today and additional written statement be filed within four weeks thereafter. 3. With reference to the order of this Court dated 5th August, 2002, State of Assam v. Union of India, (2010) 15 SCC 617 K.K. Venugopal, appearing for State of Assam that the State of Assam has no objection to have a reference to the Boundary Commission to demarcate the constitutional boundary between the two States, and in that regard response will be filed within a week from today. 4. State of Nagaland will also give its response to the said Boundary Commission. State of Arunachal has already filed its response. It will be in the interest of all concerned to get this dispute settled by a Boundary Commission to be appointed by the Union of India. I.A. No. 7 in Original Suit No. 2. This application by the Election Commission to have additional election booths on the alleged encroached area, subject to the final decision in the suit, cannot be allowed. The Election Commission would do well in having the election booths as it had in 1991 Elections. Court Masters.