JUDGMENT M.R. Verma, J.—This application has been moved, by the petitioner praying for grant of certificate of fitness to file Criminal Appeal against the order dated 8.3.2002 passed by this Court in Cr.M.M.O. No.51 of 2001 titled Harmesh Singh v. Namit Kumar and another. It is averred that the said order is illegal, unconstitutional and contrary to law and liable to be quashed because by virtue of the said order the respondents herein got illegal benefits and illegal payments contrary to law and the fundamental rights of the applicant to life and liberty have been infringed. 2. I have heard the petitioner and Shri Ashok Negi, vice learned Counsel for the respondents. 3. Be it stated at the very outset that the aforesaid Cr.M.M.O. No. 51 of 2001 preferred by the petitioner was heard and disposed of on 8.3.2002 in the presence of Mr.Y.Paul Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. N.K.Thakur, Counsel for respondent Nov 3 in the said petition. At that time, no oral application was made by or on behalf of the petitioner immediately after passing of the order in question in the said Cr.M.M.O. 4. After the amendment of Article 133 (1) and introduction of Article 134-A by the 42nd Amendment of the Constitution no written application is required for a certificate for appeal to Supreme Court. Article 134-A provides that oral application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court should be made immediately after the judgment/final order is delivered. Written application made long after the passing of judgment/order is thus not maintainable. In the case in hand, as already stated, no oral application for grant of the certificate was made by or on behalf of the petitioner immediately after the pronouncement of the order dated 8.3.2002 in Cr.M.M.O. No.51 of 2001 and the present application was filed by the petitioner on 22.5.2002, therefore, evidently the present application is not maintainable and deserves to be dismissed. 5. As a result, this application is dismissed. -