Petitioners case is that they are owners in possession and in cultivation of land measuring 39 Kanals and 3 Marlas situated at Bagat-i-Barzella, fully described in para 2 of the petition. Dy. Custodian Evacuee Property Kashmir, Srinagar has notified this land as Evacuee Property having vested in custodian under Section 6(1) of the Evacuee Administration of Property Act, 2006. This notification is challenged in this petition. The petitioners have effective alternate remedy to question this notification as also advance claim to the property on the ground that the property is not evacuee property or that the interests of the petitioners thereto is not affected by the provisions of Evacuee Properties Act, 2002. This the petitioners can do under Section 8 of the Act. The custodian/empowered authorized officer is to pass orders on enquiry in which an opportunity is given to lead evidence and then to pass a reasoned order thereto. Not only so, the order so passed is subject to appeal review and revision as contained in Section 30 & 30 A of the Jammu and Kashmir State Evacuees (Administration of Property) Act 2006. 2. In view of this effective enforceable alternate remedy, the writ petition is not maintainable and is dismissed in limini. It is as clear as it can be that in such matters adverse orders cannot be passed against interested person(s)/claiment(s) unless he/they is/are given an opportunity of being heard. Disposed of accordingly.