ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the order of the trial court as well as the appellate court. Both the courts have given concurrent findings that the petitioner is not a juvenile. The trial court made an estimate of his age to be 18 years. On a subsequent application by the petitioner an enquiry was initiated and the Medical Board estimated the age of the petitioner between 18 to 20 years. The court below preferred not to rely upon the certificate of age given by the school authority. 2. It has been submitted that the medical report did not contain with it the radiological report or in other words the x-rays plates on whose basis and on the basis of petitioner's appearance the Board made an estimate of petitioner's age. The fact that the x-rays plat were required for argument should have been raised at the stage of trial before the Magistrate. Non-availability of the radiological report alone will not vitiate the concurrent findings of the courts below regarding the age of the petitioner. 3. Considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is not persuaded to interfere with the impugned orders. This revision application is accordingly, dismissed.