JUDGMENT Irshad Hussain, J. : Heard Sri K. S. Verma, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri J. P. Joshi, learned counsel for the Opposite Party No.2. 2. The petition was moved under Section 482 of the Cr. P. C. with a prayer that the Investigating Officer examined in the trial need to be recalled so that he may be cross-examined about the existence of the special report of the incident. An application after cross-examination of the investigating Officer was submitted before the concerned Sessions Judge, who rejected it on merit. The Head Moharrir examined in the case as P. W. 7 had comprehensively been cross-examined on this point and therefore, there was no occasion to recall the Investigating Officer for further cross-examination. 3. Learned Counsel for the O. P. No.2 drew my attention to the statement of P. W. 7 and also P. W. 6, copies of which have been annexed with the counter affidavit and having considered the same, I find myself in agreement with the contention of the learned counsel for the O. P. No.2 that Head Moharrir had been cross-examined on the point of the existence of the special report and the fact that the copy of the same were n9t available and the contents of the same were not entered in the G. D. When the things are such, it will be useless to summon the Investigation officer for further cross-examination. Hence prayer for recalling him cannot be entertained. 4. The petition is hereby dismissed.