Research › Search › Judgment

Karnataka High Court · body

2002 DIGILAW 318 (KAR)

T. SATISH U. PAI v. NARAYAN NAGAPPA NAYAK

2002-05-28

K.SREEDHAR RAO

body2002
K. SREEDHAR RAO, J. ( 1 ) PETITION filed under Section 482, Cr. P. C. for quashing of the proceedings in C. C. No. 1849/2001, arising out of the private complaint in PC. No. 35/2001 on the file of the J. M. F. C. , Bhatkal. The respondent has filed a private complaint against the petitioner for committing an offence punishable under Section 500, Cr. P. C. There appears to be a property dispute between the respondent and one Subbaiah who is a third party. The complaint was given by Subbaiah against the respondent before the Bhatkal Police and the same was registered in Crime No. 33/2000. In the said complaint Subbaiah has alleged that the respondent had acted high handedly and assaulted by chasing Subbaiah and his family members. The offence of trespass into the house and perpetrated violent Acts in the premises of Subbaiah. Based on the said information with the police, the petitioner published a news in UDAYAVANI newspaper, Kannada daily. The respondent, being aggrieved by the news item, has filed the private complaint alleging that the averments made in the news item are false and defamatory. The JMFC, after taking cognizance, recorded the sworn statement and directed the issuance of process. The petitioner, being aggrieved by the said order, has filed this present petition seeking quashing of the proceedings. ( 2 ) THE respondent has appeared through a counsel. ( 3 ) IN this petition, the petitioner has produced the copy of the FIR lodged by Subbaiah and also the charge-sheet filed by the police pursuant to the pursuant to the said FIR. It is the contention of the respondent that the contents of the news item are palpably false giving deliberately a distorted version of the incident. ( 4 ) AFTER hearing the counsel for the petitioner and on perusal of the material produced, it is not in dispute that Subbaiah had filed a complaint against the respondent before the Bhatkal Police. The same was registered in Crime No. 33/2000. Consequent to which the investigation has taken place. The charge-sheet is also filed. However the news item in question is published after registration of the FIR but investigation was still pending. ( 5 ) IT is the contention of the petitioner that based on the information available in the FIR registered by the police, the matter has been reported as a news item. The charge-sheet is also filed. However the news item in question is published after registration of the FIR but investigation was still pending. ( 5 ) IT is the contention of the petitioner that based on the information available in the FIR registered by the police, the matter has been reported as a news item. It is necessary to advert to the provisions of Section 499, IPC which deals with the offence of defamation and 4th Exception provided to the provision of law. "499. Defamation :- Whoever, by words either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs or by visible representations, made or publishes any imputation concerning any person intending to harm or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm, the reputation of such person, is said except in the cases hereinafter excepted, to defame that person. " fourth Exception :- Publication of reports of Proceedings of Courts :- It is not defamation to publish a substantially true report of the proceedings of a Court of Justice, or of the result of any such proceedings. " ( 6 ) EVIDENTLY, the petitioner is a journalist. The fourth exception envisaged in Section 499, IPC exonerates the publication of reports if they substantially make a true report of the proceedings of the Court of justice or any result of such proceedings. In the instant case, the contents of the FIR registered by the police have been published. Under the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure, any FIR registered by the police is to be submitted to the jurisdictional Magistrate forthwith and such a report to the Court becomes a matter of record in a judicial proceedings. Therefore, the news item published touching the conduct of the respondent being a subject-matter of a criminal proceedings in respect of which the police have registered a case and the same submitted to the Court. ( 7 ) IT is the contention of the respondent that the allegations made against the respondent is false. However, from the stand point of law in case of journalist reporting, the law insists that the reports published should bear an element of truth and before publication, reasonable efforts should have been made by the journalist to find out the truth and correctness of the facts reported. However, from the stand point of law in case of journalist reporting, the law insists that the reports published should bear an element of truth and before publication, reasonable efforts should have been made by the journalist to find out the truth and correctness of the facts reported. ( 8 ) IN the instant case, based on the contents of the FIR news item has been published whether or not the allegations made is true or false need not concern the journalist while publishing the same. Since the public authorities have taken cognizance of the complaint filed by Subbaiah against the respondent, they have initiated necessary legal action and any of the proceedings relating to the crime that occurred in society if report is published in the newspaper, it would not amount to defamation and squarely falls within the fourth exception of Section 499, IPC. ( 9 ) IN that view of the matter I find that the Magistrate has acted improperly in taking cognizance and in issuing process against the petitioner ignoring the provisions of law contained in Section 499, IPC. Hence the proceedings are hereby quashed. Petition allowed. --- *** --- .