Judgment Ashutosh Mohunta, J. 1. While issuing notice on July 21, 1994, further proceedings were stayed by this Court on the averments made by the counsel for the petitioners to the effect that the F.I.R. in the present case was registered on January 30, 1987 and no challan had been presented till the date of the order, i.e., July 21, 1994. 2. Today Mr. Vijay Dahiya, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, has pointed out that the challan in this case had been presented on May 11, 1987. Hence the averment made by the counsel for the petitioners was absolutely false. 3. This Court had stayed further proceedings on the basis of the averment made by Shri S.M. Sharma, counsel for the petitioners, which has been completely falsified by the records, according to which the challan had been presented on May 11, 1987. As a result of the statement made by the counsel for the petitioners, further proceedings were stayed by this Court, due to which trial could not proceed and the case has remained dormant for almost 8 years. The Court usually trusts the Advocates that the statements made by them would be true and correct. I find that the statement made by the counsel for the petitioners has thwarted the process of justice and undue advantage has been obtained by them. In these circumstances, the present petition for quashing the first information report is dismissed. The blatant lie spoken by Shri S.M. Sharma, Counsel for the petitioners, has resulted in further proceedings having been stayed for about 8 years. Thus, I impose a fine of Rs. 20,000/- upon the accused, who shall deposit the same within a period of one month before the trial court from the receipt of the certified copy of this order. The complainant will be entitled to withdraw the amount of fine deposited by the accused. The trial court is directed to expedite the matter and decide it within six months.