Research › Browse › Judgment

Supreme Court of India · body

2002 DIGILAW 349 (SC)

Aruna Roy v. Union of India

2002-03-01

B.P.SINGH, S.P.BHARUCHA, SHIVARAJ V.PATIL

body2002
ORDER : 1. I.A. Nos.2, 5 and 6 are allowed. 2. Rule. 3. Issue notice on the application for interim relief. 4. Mr. M.N. Krishnamani, learned counsel, appears for the NCERT and Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, the learned Additional Solicitor General, appears for the Union of India. They submit that the matter should be adjourned for the purposes of interim relief for two weeks. To our pointed question as to why the CABE has not been consulted, learned counsel for the respondents are unable to answer. We have also asked them whether they are willing to undertake that they will not implement the new curriculum pending further orders. They are unable to do so without instructions. 5. In the circumstances, for the purposes of interim relief, the matter shall come up after two weeks. In the meantime, there shall be a direction to respondents 1, 2 and 3 not to further implement the new curriculum without prior consultation with CABE.