( 1 ) AFTER hearing learned counsel for parties at great length, we find that the petitioner is not agitating a public cause. As a matter of fact, this petition suffers from complete lack of bona fides. He is pursuing a personal cause against the respondents. Respondent 5 was allotted land by State Government in the Industrial area for establishing an industry. While raising boundary wall, he found that some part or the land allotted to him has been encroached by the petitioner. Accordingly, he approached the Department for giving him the said land. The Department asked Sub-Divisional Officer to remove encroachment and hand over land to the respondent 5. The petitioner did not comply with the direction. Thereafter, FIR (Annex. R6)has also been filed with respect to this land. Civil suit was also filed in Civil Court and decree of injunction was obtained by the respondent 5 since the petitioner failed to appear. After decree was passed the petitioner approached the Court for setting aside the same. Matter is pending in the Civil Court. The petitioner has also filed civil suit with respect to this property. With regard to allegation of air and water pollution, the Pollution Control board reports that there is no such pollution. ( 2 ) IN the aforesaid background, petitioner could not have filed petition in public interest in this Court. It is a personal grievance which is sought to be agitated through this kind of litigation which is not meant for entertaining such disputes. We are clearly of the opinion that it is a gross misuse of jurisdiction of this court. Consequently, petitioner must suffer cost. We therefore, impose cost of Rs. 25,000 (Rupees twenty five thousand only) upon the petitioner and dismiss the petition. Petition dismissed. .