ORDER 1. The assessee makes agarbathis. The Tribunal, following its judgment in the case of Ambica Chemical Products held in favour ofthe assessee. 2. Our attention is drawn by learned counsel for the Revenue to the findings of the Collector, Central Excise that power was used by the assessee in making nurva and mas ala paste in the course of the manufacture of agarbathis and that, therefore, they were classifiable under Tariff Item 69 and were dutiable. Our attention was also drawn to the judgment of this Court in Padmini Products v. CCE2 where it has been held that agarbathis were not entitled to be treated as handicrafts and, therefore, exempted if some portion of the work required for their manufacture was done by hand but the main portion thereof was done with the aid of power. 3. Now, in the instant case, clearly, the judgment of this Court in the case of Padmini Products2 would apply if the main part of the manufacturing process undertaken by the assessee was with the aid of power. But there is no application of mind by the Tribunal to this aspect. It seems to us, therefore, appropriate that the appeal (E/ A No. 806 of 1986- D) should stand restored to the file of the Tribunal at New Delhi to con~der what the facts in regard to the manufacture of agarbathis by the assessee are, in the light of the judgment of this Court in the case of Padmili Products2 4.Order on the appeal accordingly. 5.No order as to costs.