JUDGMENT 1. - This second bail application under section 439 Cr.RC. filed on behalf of Mangla Ram and Patasi Their first bail application No. 3333/2001 was dismissed by me on 7.11.2001. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that since then statements of father, mother and two brothers of the deceased have been recorded by the trial court and ail of them have been declared hostile. He further submits that they are permanent residents of Distt. Nagaur and having immovable property therefore there is no likelihood of their absconding. It is father submitted that the husband of the deceased has also been released on bail by the High Court and both these petitioners being father-in-law and mother-in-law aged above 60 years they be also given benefit of bail. 3. Learned RR has not seriously opposed it. 4. Without expressing anything on the merits of the case and keeping in view the changed circumstances I feel inclined to give them benefit of bail. 5. Accordingly this second bail is under section 439 Cr.RC. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused petitioner (s) namely Mangia Ram and Patasi be released on bail provided each of them furnish (es) a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- alongwith two sound and solvent sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court. They shall further give an undertaking that they shall appear before the trial court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. Other conditions of bail will be prescribed by the learned trial court.Application allowed. *******