Oriental Fire and General Insurance Company Limited v. Merry Kujur
2002-01-30
GURUSHARAN SHARMA, HARI SHANKAR PRASAD
body2002
DigiLaw.ai
By Court.- The Oriental Fire and General Insurance Company Limited has preferred present appeal challenging judgment and award dated 18.2.1993, passed under Section 110A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. 2. Admittedly, Nocodin Kujur Koel, husband of respondent no. 1 and father of respondent nos. 2 and 3 died in a motor accident on 14.8.1984, while travelling in a tracker (B.P.N. 6937) from Ranchi to Lohardaga. 3. The accident took place when the tracker dashed against a standing truck near village Kokar. Nocodin Kujur Koel sustained serious injuries and died at Kuru Hospital. 4. At the time of accident deceased was aged about 47 years and was in service as Upper Division Clerk in Jarangdih colliery under C.C.L. and his monthly salary was Rs. 1524.47.paise. 5. The tracker in question was insured with the Oriental Fire and General Insurance Company Limited at the time of accident. Insurance policy was brought on record and marked as Exhibit 1 at the instance of the Insurance Company. 6. It was established on the basis OT evidence adduced by parties that accident took place for the fault of driver of the tracker and Nocodin Kujur Koel died therein. 7. The Tribunal assessed annual dependency at Rs. 12,000/-, after deducting one third income of the deceased towards his personal expenditures and considering his age applied thirteen multiplier and thus Rs. 1,56,000/- was assessed to be paid as compensation. 8. We find no illegality in the assessing the amount of compensation and as such no interference is required therein. 9. The Tribunal has granted interest @ 15 per cent per annum on the aforesaid compensation amount from 19.2.1985, when application for compensation was filed before the Tribunal till realisation. We modify the rate of interest on the ratio of a recent decision of the Apex Court in Kaushnuma Begum and others vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and others, [2001 (1) JLJR 322 (SC)], and reduced it from 15 per cent to 9 per cent. 10. The Tribunal has also granted penal interest @ 18 per cent per annum on failure of Insurance Company to pay the amount of award with interest within two months from the date of impugned judgment.
Ltd. and others, [2001 (1) JLJR 322 (SC)], and reduced it from 15 per cent to 9 per cent. 10. The Tribunal has also granted penal interest @ 18 per cent per annum on failure of Insurance Company to pay the amount of award with interest within two months from the date of impugned judgment. The said direction of the impugned judgment is also modified to the effect that if the appellant failed to pay the amount of award with interest within two months from today, claimants shall be entitled to get interest @ 18 per cent instead of 9 per cent. 11. This appeal is disposed of with aforesaid observations and directions. However, there shall be no order as to costs.