C. Jeyaraman v. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest & Another
2002-08-19
PRABHA SRIDEVAN
body2002
DigiLaw.ai
Judgment :- Writ petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to dispose of the representation dated 07.10.1996. 2. According to the petitioner, he had purchased timber for constructing his house and he had transported it through a check post legally. However, the Forest Protection Squad had arrested him and his aged father on the ground, it was timber that was enter possession illegally. All that the petitioner requests is consideration and disposal of his representation. 3. The Special Government Pleader takes notice. 4. The affidavit discloses that not only the petitioner but also his aged father were threatened with arrest if they refused to pay the fine and a fine of Rs.10,000/- also appears to have been paid. 5. Six years have passed and the first respondent authorities appear to be in a state of slumber. It is very unfortunate that responsible officers should take their own time to consider the representations of the citizens. This is their duty and the citizens have a right to expect some orders within a reasonable time; and not have to approach this Court for a mandamus. Perhaps if the slow moving officers are made to pay costs, they will shift gear and move fast. Day after day, this Court is flooded with petitions merely to direct the officers to pass orders. This is a colossal waste of time, energy, money, not to mention valuable paper, and all because one officer somewhere is failing to act in time. The officers must remember that there is a limit to the patience of anyone, even the poor ordinary common man. 6. The above writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 07.10.1996 within a period of four weeks in accordance with law. No costs.