Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2002 DIGILAW 954 (RAJ)

Vishnu Shanker v. State of Rajasthan

2002-05-08

O.P.BISHNOI

body2002
JUDGMENT 1. - This appeal has been filed by Vishnu Shanker and Jagdish Prasad against a judgment dated 24.7.1998 delivered by the learned Special Judge, Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Court, Udaipur, whereby the appellants were acquitted of the charge Under Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act and ere convicted Under Section 3(1)(v) of the said Act as well as Under Sections 447 and 427 of the I.P.C. 2. So far as the offences Under Sections 447 and 427 are concerned, the complainant Navla and the accused persons on 18.7.2001 entered into a compromise which was filed in this Court and was verified by the Deputy Registrar (Judicial). 3. Consequently, the two appellants are acquitted of the charges Under Sections 427 and 447 of the I.P.C. 4. Now, the conviction Under Section 3(1)(v) of the SC/ST Act remains. 5. I have heard the learned Counsel for the appellants as well as learned Public Prosecutor for the State and have perused the record of the case. I find that the finding of guilt in respect of Section 3(1)(v): of the said Act is not sustainable. The grievance was to the effect that the accused were forcing their way through the agricultural field of the complainant illegally. However, the Patwari (P.W. 8) Mahendra Singh was stated that the passage was lawful and the complainant side was bent upon closing the same. He further stated that the passage was used for going to the 'Charagah', but the complainant Navla used to close the passage again and again. He has further stated that the passage in question was a public passage and the same was opened by him and the Tehsildar on 21.3.1996 in the presence of all the villagers, as well as the Sarpanch of the village. 6. Needless to say that in view of the said testimony of the Patwari, the charge Under Section 3(1)(v) of the SC/ST Act could not be sustained. 7. Consequently, the appeal is allowed. As pointed out earlier, the accused persons are acquitted of the offences Under Sections 447 and 427 of the I.P.C. on account of the compromise dated 18.7.2001. In respect of conviction Under Section 3(1)(v) of the SC/ST Act, the appeal is allowed on merits. The findings of guilt arrived at by the impugned judgment is set aside. The appellants are acquitted of all the charges.Appeal allowed. *******