ORDER : S.N. Variava, J. - By this I.A. the applicant is seeking clarification to the effect that he has not accepted any benefit under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme of the Respondent-Bank and that therefore the 1st direction in the judgment of this Court dated 17th December, 2001 in Civil Appeal No. 854 of 2002 is not applicable to him. He also seeks a direction that he be re-instated with continuity in service. 2. The 1st direction in the judgment dated 17th December, 2001 reads as follows:- "1. The appeals preferred by the Nationalised Banks arising from the High Courts are dismissed except the cases where the concerned employees have accepted a part of the benefit under the scheme. However, in respect of such of the employees who despite acceptance of a part of the retirement benefit under the scheme had continued under the orders of the High Court and has retired on attaining the age of superannuation, this order shall not apply;" 3. In this case, admittedly, the respondent-Bank had deposited all amounts due, under the Scheme, in the Bank Account of the applicant. If matters are stood as such, a different situation may have arisen. However, admittedly the applicant withdrew sums of Rs. 2,50,000/- and 25,000/- from that account. We are unable to accept the submission that this withdrawal was not under the aforesaid Scheme. This money was not due to the applicant except under the Scheme. 5. The applicant could not have withdrawn the same except under the Scheme. Having withdrawn the amounts due under the Scheme, mere re-deposit of the same would not help the applicant. The first direction being clear, this I.A. stands dismissed.