Research › Browse › Judgment

Supreme Court of India · body

2003 DIGILAW 1223 (SC)

RESEARCH FOUNDATIQN FOR SCIENCE (12) v. UNION OF INDIA

2003-09-24

B.N.AGARWAL, Y.K.SABHARWAL

body2003
ORDER 1. AFTER HEARING LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER: IN RESPECT OF ADEQUATE FACILITIES OF TESTING AT THE LABORATORIES AT THE GATEWAY POINTS I.E. PORTS, ICDS, CUSTOMS AREAS, FOR TESTING POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS WASTES AND RECYC1ABLESAND THE SAID LABORATORIES BEING MANNED BY THE TRAINED STAFF, THE STAND OF MOEF IS THAT THE CUSTOMS LABS ARE BEING UPGRADED. MR A.D.N. RAO SEEKS 12 MONTHS TIME TO UPGRADE THE LABS. ALLOWING THE SAID REQUEST, BUT DIRECTING QUARTERLY REPORTS TO BE FILED IN THIS COURT DETAILING THE PROGRESS MADE, THE LABS AS SUGGESTED SHOULD BE UPGRADED AND MANNED STAFF OFFICERS POSTED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF 12 MONTHS. COMPLIANCE G REPORT SHALL BE FILED SOON AFTER EXPIRY OF 12 MONTHS. MEANWHILE, THE TEST SHALL BE CONDUCTED BY ACCREDITED LABORATORIES CERTIFIED BY CPCB. 2. CPCB, MR PANJWANI STATES, IS IMPARTING PERIODICAL TRAINING TO CUSTOMS AND PORT OFFICIALS, THE DOCUMENT PREPARED BY DR. K.R. RANGANATHAN, A MEMBER OF HPC, ON THE ASPECT OF TESTING METHOD FOR ANALYSIS OF HAZARDOUS WASTES, INSTRUMENTATION AND TRAINING REQUIREMENTS SHALL FORM PART OF THE TRAINING IMPARTED BY CPCE. 3. SECTION II OF THE CUSTOMS ACT, 1962 EMPOWERS THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT TO PROHIBIT EITHER ABSOLUTELY OR SUBJECT TO SUCH CONDITIONS AS MAY BE SPECIFIED IN THE NOTIFICATION THE IMPORT AND EXPORT :OF THE GOODS IF SATISFIED THAT IT IS NECESSARY SO TO DO FOR ANY OF THE PURPOSES STATED IN SUB-SECTION (2). IT IS IMPLICIT THAT IF IMPORT IS IN CONTRAVENTION OF ANY LAW FOR THE TIME BEING IN FORCE SUCH IMPORT IS REQUIRED TO BE PROHIBITED. 4. THE IMPORT OF 29 ITEMS HAS ALREADY BEEN PROHIBITED UNDER SCHEDULE 8 OF THE HAZARDOUS, WASTE RULES AS AMENDED IN MAY 2003. WE SEE NO REASON WHY NOTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 11 PROHIBITING THE IMPORT OF THE SAID 29 ITEMS SHALL NOT BE ISSUED FORTHWITH. WE DIRECT THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT TO ISSUE SUCH A NOTIFICATION WITHOUT ANY FURTHER DELAY. 5. BASEL CONVENTION HAS BANNED 76 ITEMS. WE ARE CONTEMPLATING ISSUE OF DIRECTIONS TO THE MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS TO EXAMINE THE REMAINING ITEMS. IT IS IMPLICIT THAT IF MORE ITEMS ARE BANNED, THE CORRESPONDING NOTIFICATION SHALL BE ISSUED BY THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT UNDER SECTION 11 OF THE CUSTOMS ACT. 6. THE HW RULES ALLOW IMPORT OF CERTAIN ITEMS SUBJECT TO FULFILMENT OF CONDITIONS. WE ARE CONTEMPLATING ISSUE OF DIRECTIONS TO THE MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS TO EXAMINE THE REMAINING ITEMS. IT IS IMPLICIT THAT IF MORE ITEMS ARE BANNED, THE CORRESPONDING NOTIFICATION SHALL BE ISSUED BY THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT UNDER SECTION 11 OF THE CUSTOMS ACT. 6. THE HW RULES ALLOW IMPORT OF CERTAIN ITEMS SUBJECT TO FULFILMENT OF CONDITIONS. THE REQUISITE NOTIFICATION SHALL BE ISSUED MAKING THE COMPLIANCE OF THE SAID CONDITIONS MANDATORY BEFORE THE IMPORTED CONSIGNMENT IS CLEARED. 7. THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY, WHILE DISPOSING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, IN EXERCISE OF POWER UNDER SECTIONS 61 AND 62 OF THE MAJOR PORT TRUSTS ACT, 1963, IS DIRECTED TO ENSURE THAT THE HAZARDOUS WASTE RULES, AS AMENDED UP TO DATE, SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH, IN PARTICULAR, RULES 19 AND 20 THEREOF. 8. THE EXPORT AND IMPORT POLICY (EXIM POLICY) ISSUED FROM TIME TO TIME, UNDER THE FOREIGN TRADE (DEVELOPMENT AND REGULATION) ACT, 1992, INTER ALIA, SETS OUT THE GOODS, IMPORT WHEREOF IS PROHIBITED; WE DIRECT THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT THAT THE SAID POLICY SHALL ALSO CORRESPOND WITH THE HAZARDOUS WASTE RULES, AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME, WHICH MEANS THAT IF IMPORT OF ANY ITEM IS PROHIBITED UNDER THE HAZARDOUS WASTE RULES, IT SHALL BE REFLECTED IN THE PREVALENT EXIM POLICY." 9. FOR DESIGN AND SETTING UP OF DISPOSAL FACILITY AS PROVIDED IN RULE 8-A OF THE HW (M&H) RULES, THE CRITERIA FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE LANDFILLS PUBLISHED BY CPCB IN FEBRUARY 2001 AND THE MANUAL FOR DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND QUALITY CONTROL OF LINERS AND COVERS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE LANDFILLS PUBLISHED IN DECEMBER 2002 SHALL BE FOLLOWED AND ADHERED TO. ALONG WITH THE AFFIDAVIT OR MR M. SUBBA RAO; FILED ON 13-9-2003, ANNEXURE SETS OUT THE STATUS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL SITES. ACCORDING TO THE SAID ANNEXURE, 89 SITES WERE IDENTIFIED OUT OF WHICH 30 WERE NOTIFIED. MR AD.N. RAO, ON INSTRUCTIONS, STATES THAT OUT OF 30, 11 LANDFILLS ARE READY AND OPERATIONAL - TWO IN MAHARASHTRA, ONE IN ANDHRA, PRADESH AND EIGHT, IN GUJARAT AND THAT THESE LANDFILLS ARE IN ACCORD WITH THE CRITERIA AND MANUAL AFORESAID. THE STEPS SHALL BE TAKEN TO EXPEDITE THE COMPLETION OF THE REMAINING LANDFILLS. IN THIS VIEW, STEPS SHOULD BE TAKEN FOR SHIFTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE FROM WHEREVER IT IS PERMISSIBLE TO THESE LANDFILLS. THE TRANSPORT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE WOULD BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 7 AND THE GUIDELINES ISSUED BY CPCB FROM TIME TO TIME. THE STEPS SHALL BE TAKEN TO EXPEDITE THE COMPLETION OF THE REMAINING LANDFILLS. IN THIS VIEW, STEPS SHOULD BE TAKEN FOR SHIFTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE FROM WHEREVER IT IS PERMISSIBLE TO THESE LANDFILLS. THE TRANSPORT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE WOULD BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 7 AND THE GUIDELINES ISSUED BY CPCB FROM TIME TO TIME. MR PANJWANI STATES THAT THE GUIDELINES ARE READY. LET THE SAME BE ISSUED FORTHWITH. 10. CPCB SHOULD ISSUE THE REQUISITE GUIDELINES TO BE FOLLOWED FOR THE PURPOSE OF UPKEEP OF THE DISPOSAL SITES. 11. CPCB SHALL ISSUE GUIDELINES TO BE FOLLOWED BY ALL CONCERNED INCLUDING SPCB AND THE OPERATORS OF DISPOSAL SITES FOR THE PROPER FUNCTIONING AND UPKEEP OF THE SAID SITES.. 12. WE HAVE CONSIDERED THE SUGGESTION OF HPC UNDER TERM OF REFERENCE 4 RELATING TO IMPACT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE ON WORKERS HEALTH. HAVING REGARD TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUBMISSIONS MADE BY THE LEARNED COUNSEL WE DIRECT THE MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND MINISTRY OF INDUSTRY TO CONSTITUTE A SPECIAL COMMITTEE TO EXAMINE, THE MATTER AND ENUMERATE MEDICAL BENEFITS WHICH MAY BE PROVIDED TO THE WORKERS HAVING REGARD TO THE OCCUPATIONAL HAZARD AS ALSO KEEPING IN VIEW THE QUESTION OF HEALTH OF THE WORKERS AND THE COMPENSATION WHICH MAY HAVE TO BE PAID TO THEM. THE COMMITTEE WHILE EXAMINING THE RECOMMENDATIONS, SHALL ALSO KEEP IN VIEW THE JUDGMENT OF THIS COURT IN CONSUMER EDUCATION AND RESEARCH CENTRE V. UNION OF INDIA1. THE REPORT OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITHIN A PERIOD OF FOUR MONTHS: 13. FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS, LIST ON 25-9-2003. COURT MASTERS