ORDER : Heard parties. 2. By the impugned order the High Court refused to interfere with the order of acquittal passed by trial Court whereby all the respondents were acquitted of the charges under Sections 302/201/120B/328 and 364 of the Indian Penal Code. From bare perusal of the order of acquittal passed by the trial Court and the order sheet of the trial Court it would appear that the original Court did not take appropriate steps for securing attendance of the prosecution witnesses inasmuch as it does not appear from the order sheet as to whether warrants of arrest issued against the witnesses were executed or not. It is well settled that in a serious case like the present one the Court should have adopted all the modes for securing attendance of the witnesses, which has not been done in the present case. On this ground alone the impugned orders are to be quashed. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the impugned orders of the trial Court as well as the High Court are set aside and the matter is remitted to the trial Court for disposal in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all the parties. 4. After remand the trial Court shall give opportunity to the prosecution to examine further witnesses and thereafter proceed to dispose of the case in accordance with law. The appeal and the criminal miscellaneous petition are disposed of accordingly. 5. It has been stated at the Bar that respondent No. 2. to 6 were on bail during the trial, which fact has not been disputed on behalf of the appellant. During the pendency of the trial the respondents shall continue to remain on bail. 6. It is clarified that as this case has been disposed of, the interim order passed by this Court stands vacated. Case disposed of.