Jheky] lnL; & ;s rhuksa utjlkfu;kW jktLFkku Hkw jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1956 ¼ftls rRipkr~ ^vf/kfu;e* kCn ls lacksf/kr fd;k tkosxk½ dh /kkjk 86 ds varxZr e.My dh ,dyihB ds fu.kZ; fnukad 11-8-2003 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- izdj.k ds la{ksi esa rF; bl izdkj gS fd xzke gluiqj esa ukekUrjdj.k la- 268 xzke y{e.kx<+ ds ukekarjdj.k la- 576 ,oa xzke ekStiqj esa ukekUrjdj.k la- 1143 [kkrsnkj ukuxjke iq= dkywjke ds QkSr gksus ij fojklr ds vk/kkj ij cgd izsepan iq= ukuxjke ds uke [kksyk x;k ftls xzke iapk;r }kjk dzek% fnukad 5-6-82] 25-5-82 ,oa 20-6-82 dks Lohd`r dj fn;kA bu rhuksa ukekUrjdj.kksa ds fo:) vizkFkhZ la- 1 deyk ckbZ iq=h ukuxjke us izFke vihy mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] y{e.kx<+ ds ;gkW isk dh mUgksaus vius vknsk fnukad 27-3-99 ls vizkFkhZ la- 1 dh vihy Lohdkj dj mDr ukekUrjdj.k la- 268 gluiqj] ukekUrjdj.k la- 576 y{e.kx<+] ukekUrjdj.k la- 1143 ekStiwj ckcr~ rglhynkj] y{e.kx<+ dks izdj.k bl funsZk ds lkFk izfrizsf"kr fd;k fd nksuksa i{kksa dks lquokbZ dk iw.kZ volj nsrs gq, e`rd ukuxjke ds okfjlku dh leqfpr tkap dj fu;ekuqlkj bardky QSlyk djsaA bl vknsk ls vlarq"V gksdj izkFkhZ us rhu vihysa vfrfjDr laHkkxh; vk;qDr] t;iqj ds U;k;ky; esa isk dh ftUgksaus vius fu.kZ; fnukad 14-7-2000 }kjk rhuksa vihysa vLohdkj dj nhA fu.kZ; fnukad 14-7-2000 ls O;fFkr gksdj izkFkhZ us rhu fuxjkfu;kW jktLo e.My esa isk dhA e.My dh ,dyihB us vius fu.kZ; fnukad 11-8-2003 }kjk rhuksa fuxjkfu;kW [kkfjt dj nh mDr fu.kZ; ls O;fFkr gksdj izkFkhZ us vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 86 ds vUrxZr ;g rhu utjlkfu;kW izLrqr dh gSA 3- mDr lHkh utjlkfu;ksa esa rF; ,oa ifjfLFkfr;kW rFkk fu/kkZj.k ;ksX; dkuwuh fcUnq ,d leku gS blfy, lHkh utjlkfu;ksa dks ,d gh vknsk ls fuLrkfjr fd;k tk jgk gSA vknsk dh izfr izR;sd i=koyh esa i`Fkd i`Fkd j[kh tkosaA 4- izkFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dks utjlkuh dh xzkg~;rk ds Lrj ij lqukA 5- fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ dk rdZ gS fd vfrfjDr laHkkxh; vk;qDr] t;iqj ds ;gkW izkFkhZ dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha gqvk Fkk fQj Hkh vihyh; U;k;ky; us xq.kkoxq.k ds vk/kkj ij vihy dk fuLrkj.k dj fn;k tks fd vknsk 41 fu;e 17 ¼1½ flfoy izfdz;k lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds foijhr gSA vius dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus vCnqy jgeku ,.M vnlZ cuke vfrQk csxe ,.M vnlZ ¼1½] ,oa iq[kjkt ,.M vuknj cuke daqth ,.M vnlZ ¼2½] U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa dk lgkjk fy;kA mudk ;g Hkh dguk Fkk fd mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] vyoj ds ;gkW vihy lhek vof/k ds ckgj izLrqr dh xbZ Fkh ijUrq mi[k.M vf/kdkjh us fe;kn ds laca/k esa dksbZ vknsk vius fu.kZ; esa ugha fn;k] ftl ij v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa us fu.kZ; ikfjr djrs le; xkSj ugha fd;kA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ Fkk vizkFkhZ la- 1 fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa i{kdkj ugha Fkk bl dkj.k mls vihy isk djus dk vf/kdkj ugha FkkA ;fn mlds fgrksa ij dqBkjk?kkr gks jgk Fkk rks /kkjk 96 flfoy izfdz;k lafgrk ds vuqlkj vihy isk djus ds fy;s mls vuqefr izkIr djuk vko;d FkkA tSlk fd vkj-vkj-Mh- 1985 ist 584¼3½] ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1971 ,l-lh- ist 1974 ¼4½] ds fu.kZ;ksa esa vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku Fkk fd izuxr ekeys esa ukekUrj.k fMLI;wVsM Fkk bl dkj.k bldh vihy Mh-,y-vkj- ds le{k gksuh pkfg, Fkh u fd mi[k.M vf/kdkjh ds le{kA mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] vyoj dks vizkFkhZ deyk }kjk izLrqr vihy lquus dk dksbZ vf/kdkj ugha FkkA vius rdZ ds leFkZu esa vkj-vkj-Mh- 1989 ist 340¼lqijk½] U;kf;d n`"VkUr dk gokyk nsrs gq, dgk fd tc mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] vyoj dks vihy lquus dk vf/kdkj ugha Fkk rks muds }kjk tks fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k fd;k gS og muds {ks=kf/kdkj ls ijs gS] tks dk;e j[kus ;ksX; ugha gSA vr% mijksDr fcUnqvksa ds vk/kkj ij utjlkuh dks Lohdkj fd;k tkosA 6- eSaus fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ dh cgl ij euu fd;k rFkk miyC/k vfHkys[k dk ifjkhyu fd;kA 7- vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 63¼1½ bl izdkj gS%& ^^;fn fdlh jktLo U;k;ky; vFkok vf/kdkjh ds le{k eqdnes vFkok dk;Zokgh esa dksbZ i{kdkj lquokbZ ds fy, fu;r rkjh[k ij vFkok ckn dh fdlh rkjh[k vFkok rkjh[kksa ij] ftu ij fd lquokbZ LFkfxr dj nh xbZ gksa] mifLFkr ugha gks rks eqdnek vFkok dk;Zokgh mldh vuqifLFkfr esa lquh rFkk fu.khZr dh tk ldrh gS vFkok O;frdze esa ¼in default vne iSjoh esa½ [kkfjt dh tk ldrh gSA** mijksDr ls Li"V gS fd ;fn vihykFkhZ vihy dh lquokbZ ds fy, iqdkj gksus ij milatkr ugha gksrk gS rks U;k;ky; xq.kkoxq.k ds vk/kkj ij vihy dk fu.kZ; djus esa l{ke gSA vknsk 41 fu;e 17¼1½ flfoy izfdz;k lafgrk ds izko/kku orZeku izdj.k ij ykxw ugha gksrsA bl dkj.k izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr U;kf;d n`"VkUr Hkh rF;ksa dh fHkUurk ds dkj.k izuxr izdj.k ij ykxw ugha gksrsA 8- izkFkhZ ds ifjlhek dk fcUnq mBk;k gS ftls mlus muds }kjk iwoZ esa isk dh xbZ fuxjkuh esa Hkh mBk;k FkkA e.My dh ,dyihB us fnukad 11-8-2003 dks fu.kZ; iznku djrs le; ifjlhek ds laca/k esa mBk;s x;s fcUnq dks /;ku esa j[kk vkSj ml ij viuk er bl izdkj vfHkO;Dr fd;k gS%& ^^;g lgh gS fd ifjlhek fu.kZ; dh fnukad ls izkjEHk gks tkrh gSa ijUrq ;fn fdlh O;fDr dks fu.kZ; dk Kku gh u gks rks esjh lqfopkfjr jk; esa ifjlhek vof/k ,sls ekeyksa esa tkudkjh ds vk/kkj ij ykxw gksxhA ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us vkj-vkj-Mh- 1998 ist 319¼5½] esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd ifjlhek vof/k ls ckgj fdlh izdj.k dks [kkfjt djus ds iwoZ mls esfjV ij Hkh ijh{k.k dj ysuk pkfg;s vxj esfjV~l ij izdj.k vPNk gks rks ifjlhek vof/k dks {kek dj nsuk pkfg;s %& ``Limitation Act 1963, S.5-Dismissal of appeal by lower appellate court on ground of limitation without looking into merits of the case-Legality of-Held, new it must be taken as well settled principle of law that before rejecting applications u/s 5, and dismissing appeals as time-barred, Courts of law are required to put a glance as a condition precedent on merits of appeals and unless appeals are found to be hopelessly devoid of merits, ordinarily efforts should be made to decide appeals on merits. 9- izkFkhZ ds bl rdZ esa fd vihy djus ds fy;s dksbZ vuqefr ugha yh gS] dksbZ lkj ugha gSA D;ksafd fnukad 11-8-2003 ds fu.kZ; esa bl i{k dks iSjk 7 esa vafdr dj j[kk gS tks bl izdkj gS%& ^^vizkFkhZx.k us tks vihy isk dh mlesa bl ckr dk foLr`r mYys[k dj j[kk gS fd og O;fFkr i{kdkj gSaA vkj-vkj-Mh- 1995 ist 179¼6½] ds vuqlkj eSa vizkFkhZx.k dks O;fFkr i{kdkj ekurk gwW vkSj mUgsa vihy isk djus dh vyx ls btktr ysus ds t:jr ugha le>rk%& ``Code of Civil Procedure- (a) Section 96-Appeal by a person who was not a party before trial court, inter-alia, setting forth the grounds on which be was entitled to appeal - No separate application for permission to file appeal submitted - Appeal admitted and decided by appellate court treating appellant as a party to the appeal-Appellate order could not be set aside on the ground that permission to file appeal had not been obtained earlier. 10- izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr nsohyky cuke tsBqth ¼7½] orZeku izdj.k ds rF;ksa ij ykxw ugha gksrh] D;ksaafd nsohyky ds izdj.k esa ukekUrjdj.k dh dk;Zokgh dUVsLV gqbZ Fkh ijUrq orZeku izdj.k esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa fcuk ukekUrjdj.k dh dk;Zokgh fcuk dUVsLV ds gqbZ bl dkj.k ls vizkFkhZ us mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] y{e.kx<+ ftyk vyoj ds ;gkW izLrqr dh] tks lgh FkhA bl laca/k esa vkj-vkj-Mh- 1987 ist 106 iSjk 21 ¼8½] esa izfrikfnr fl)kUr iw.kZ :i ls ykxw gksrk gS ftlesa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd%& ``As already stated the appellate forum would depend on the question as to whether the mutation order was passed under sub-sec. (1) or sub-sec. (2) of Sec. 135. When there was no challenge before the Tehsilder then it can be found that it was an order passed under Sec. 135(1) and so. the appeal against that order would be competent to the Land Records Officer under Sec. 75(1)(d). The Collector of the District is the Land Records Officer under Sec. 20 (a)(i). The appeal is not competent to the Collector under Sec. 75(1)(a) as under Cl. (a) in any matters not connected with the settlement or Land Records, the appeal lies to the Collector from an original order passed by the Tehsilder. Admittedly, the mutation is a matter relating to the Land Records or connected with the Land Records. The appeal is not competent to the Collector under Sec. 75(1)(a) as under Cl. (a) in any matters not connected with the settlement or Land Records, the appeal lies to the Collector from an original order passed by the Tehsilder. Admittedly, the mutation is a matter relating to the Land Records or connected with the Land Records. Therefore, the appeal against the order of the Tehsilder is not competent before the Collector under Sec. 74(1) (a). But it is certainly competent to the Land Records Officer under Cl. (d) of sub-sec. (1) of Sec. 75. In Sec. 24(viii), it is provided that the Tehsilder shall be sub-ordinate to the Land Records Officer, so, the appeal to the Collector in his capacity as Land Records Officer would be competent against the order of the Tehsildar. So far as the disputed cases are concerned, the appeal against the order of the Land Records Officer shall lie under Cl.(f) of Sec. 75(1) to the Director of the Land Records in the matters connected with the land records. The notification dated 11.9.47 providing for appeal would be contrary to the provisions of the Land Revenue Act. As the notification provides that the appeal against the order of the village panchayat shall lie to the Collector under Sec. 75(1)(a). it may be stated that the village Panchayat shall act as Land Records Officer under Sec. 135(2) and it can be said that as the Land Records Officer, if an order is passed, then such an order of the Panchayat would only be appealable under Sec. 75(1) (f) to the Director of Land Records and not to the Collector. No appeal, would be competent in disputed cases under Sec. 75 (1) (a). However, so far as the present case is concerned. It hold that before the Tehsilder, there was no dispute and so the order of the Tehsilder would fall under Sub-sec. (1) of Sec. 135 and would be appealable under Cl. (d) of sub-sec. 135 (Sic S. 75) of the Land Revenue Act. However, so far as the present case is concerned. It hold that before the Tehsilder, there was no dispute and so the order of the Tehsilder would fall under Sub-sec. (1) of Sec. 135 and would be appealable under Cl. (d) of sub-sec. 135 (Sic S. 75) of the Land Revenue Act. 11- utjlkuh dk {ks= cgqr lhfer gSA mlesa r`rh; vihy ;k fuxjkuh ds :i esa iqufoZpkj ugha fd;k tk ldrkA iqufoZpkj rHkh mfpr gksxk tcfd dksbZ Hkwy vFkok xyrh fu.kZ; esa Li"V izrhr gksA izkFkhZx.k ds vf/koDrk esjs le{k fjdkMZ esa ,slh dksbZ lk{; ugha crk ik;s ftlds vk/kkj ij ;g ekuk tk ldsg fd izkFkhZx.k dks ,dyihB ds fu.kZ; ds ipkr~ dksbZ u;k nLrkost izkIr gqvk ftls og ml le; isk ugha dj ik,A fu.kZ; esa ,slh dksbZ =qfV Hkh ugha crk ik,a tks fu.kZ; dks i<+us ls Li"V n`f"Vxkspj gksrh gksA v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa us kgknr dh iw.kZ foospuk dj fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k rFkk ,dyihB us Hkh i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; dh foospuk dj v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa ds fu.kZ;ksa dh iqf"V dh gSaA jktLo e.My dh [k.MihB us xks: mQZ xksjhyky cuke jktsUnz dqekj o vU; ¼9½] ds fofup; esa bl izdkj vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd%& ``Section 229 of the Act begins with the words ``subject to the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, to which relevant provisions in CPC are applicable. Hence, order 47 of Code of Civil Procedure and the rules contained therein apply with full force to review u/s 229 of the Act. ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us Hkh ijlu nsoh cuke lqfe=h nsoh ¼10½] ds fofup; bl izdkj vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd%& ``It is well settled that review proceedings have to be strictly confined to the ambit and scope of Order 47 Rule 1 CPC. In Thungabhadra Industries Ltd. vs. Govt. of A.P. (SCR at p. 186) this Court opined: ``What however, we are now concerned with is whether the statement in the order of September 1959 that the case did not involve any substantial question of law is an `error apparent on the face of the record. The fact that on the earlier occasion the Court held on an identical state of facts that a substantial question of law arose would not per se be conclusive, for the earlier order itself might be erroneous. The fact that on the earlier occasion the Court held on an identical state of facts that a substantial question of law arose would not per se be conclusive, for the earlier order itself might be erroneous. Similarly, even if the statement was wrong, it would not follow that it was an `error apparent on the face of the record, for there is a distinction which is real, though it might not always be capable of exposition, between a mere erroneous decision and a decision which could be characterised as vitiated by `error apparent. A review by no means an appeal in disguise whereby an erroneous decision is reheard and corrected, but lies only for patent error. 12- mijksDr foospu ds ifj.kkeLo:i izkFkhZx.k }kjk izLrqr ;s rhuksa utjlkfu;ka izkFkZuk i= xzkg~;rk ds Lrj ij [kkfjt fd;s tkrs gSA mDrkuqlkj ,dyihB dk fu.kZ; fnukad 11-8-2003 ;Fkkor j[kk tkrk gSA 13- vknsk [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA